His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
Once again, the official numbers prove it: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting
Once again, the official numbers prove it: >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in
one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with
New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course
New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property
owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have
put out the message to attack him . . .
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baitingignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
Once again, the official numbers prove it: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
On 6/1/2017 9:03 PM, JohnO wrote:ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting
Once again, the official numbers prove it: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
And whats more he deliberately can't understand that more money going
into a service means that there has been an increase in their funding.
On housing:
If it wasn't for people buying houses to rent those less fortunate or
less able to control their destinies would have nowhere to live.
And those terrible State houses where the less fortunate must dwell... Terrible.
They're just as cold and damp as when they were built in the 30's and
50's and generations were born and bought up in those 'inadequate dwellings' Liebor must get sick of having to claim the current government is
spreading death and despondency at every turn yet it's the only tactic
they appear to have...
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 23:18:05 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting
major presence, possibly as high as 30% of the houses sold by this real estate firm over a three-month period, then that is very significant.”
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in
one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary
institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with
New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course
New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property
owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have
put out the message to attack him . . .
As usual, Dickbot demonstrates that he couldn't even lie straight in bed...
Here's what Twatford actually said:
“I believe it strongly suggests that offshore Chinese investors have a
and needs to implement a public foreign buyers register."and:
"Mr Twyford says government has its “heads in the sand” over the issue
buyers from purchasing property and to introducing its KiwiBuild policy."and:
"Mr Twyford says Labour is committed to banning all foreign non-resident
apologies and resign before he embarrasses New Zealand any further.https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/leaked-data-shows-chinese-offshore-buyers-fuelling-rampant-auckland-property-speculation
So... Twatford was spewing racist lies and the numbers prove it. He should
So you can't tell the difference between investors and registered
owners . . . Were you not listening when there was all that media
fuss about tax-dodging NZ registered trusts?
Naturally National has
done the least it could get away with in getting a small amount of
additional information - but not enough to stop the tax haven
industry. What better investment to put into your NZ trust than
capital gains free property?
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 23:18:05 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in
one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary
institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with
New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course
New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property
owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have
put out the message to attack him . . .
As usual, Dickbot demonstrates that he couldn't even lie straight in bed...
Here's what Twatford actually said:
I believe it strongly suggests that offshore Chinese investors have a major presence, possibly as high as 30% of the houses sold by this real estate firm over a three-month period, then that is very significant.
and:
"Mr Twyford says government has its heads in the sand over the issue and needs to implement a public foreign buyers register."
and:
"Mr Twyford says Labour is committed to banning all foreign non-resident buyers from purchasing property and to introducing its KiwiBuild policy."
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/leaked-data-shows-chinese-offshore-buyers-fuelling-rampant-auckland-property-speculation
So... Twatford was spewing racist lies and the numbers prove it. He should apologies and resign before he embarrasses New Zealand any further.
On Friday, 2 June 2017 11:04:48 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:to defend his racism you
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 23:18:05 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign. >> >>
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in
one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary
institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with
New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course
New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property
owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have
put out the message to attack him . . .
As usual, Dickbot demonstrates that he couldn't even lie straight in bed... >> >
Here's what Twatford actually said:
I believe it strongly suggests that offshore Chinese investors have a major presence, possibly as high as 30% of the houses sold by this real estate firm over a three-month period, then that is very significant.
and:
"Mr Twyford says government has its heads in the sand over the issue and needs to implement a public foreign buyers register."
and:
"Mr Twyford says Labour is committed to banning all foreign non-resident buyers from purchasing property and to introducing its KiwiBuild policy."
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/leaked-data-shows-chinese-offshore-buyers-fuelling-rampant-auckland-property-speculation
So... Twatford was spewing racist lies and the numbers prove it. He should apologies and resign before he embarrasses New Zealand any further.
So you can't tell the difference between investors and registered
owners . . . Were you not listening when there was all that media
fuss about tax-dodging NZ registered trusts?
Changing the subject so soon, Dickbot?
Naturally National has
done the least it could get away with in getting a small amount of
additional information - but not enough to stop the tax haven
industry. What better investment to put into your NZ trust than
capital gains free property?
You're either not listening or running away. Twatford was throwing poo, claiming NON RESIDENTS with CHINKY SOUNDING NAMES were buying up the houses. That has been shown to be a lie, and a filthy racist dog-whistle. In continuing
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:08:47 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 11:04:48 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 23:18:05 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting
bed...There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign. >> >>
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in >> >> one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary
institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with >> >> New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course >> >> New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property >> >> owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have >> >> put out the message to attack him . . .
As usual, Dickbot demonstrates that he couldn't even lie straight in
major presence, possibly as high as 30% of the houses sold by this real estate firm over a three-month period, then that is very significant.”
Here's what Twatford actually said:
“I believe it strongly suggests that offshore Chinese investors have a
issue and needs to implement a public foreign buyers register."
and:
"Mr Twyford says government has its “heads in the sand” over the
buyers from purchasing property and to introducing its KiwiBuild policy."
and:
"Mr Twyford says Labour is committed to banning all foreign non-resident
should apologies and resign before he embarrasses New Zealand any further.
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/leaked-data-shows-chinese-offshore-buyers-fuelling-rampant-auckland-property-speculation
So... Twatford was spewing racist lies and the numbers prove it. He
claiming NON RESIDENTS with CHINKY SOUNDING NAMES were buying up the houses. That has been shown to be a lie, and a filthy racist dog-whistle. In continuing
So you can't tell the difference between investors and registered
owners . . . Were you not listening when there was all that media
fuss about tax-dodging NZ registered trusts?
Changing the subject so soon, Dickbot?
Naturally National has
done the least it could get away with in getting a small amount of
additional information - but not enough to stop the tax haven
industry. What better investment to put into your NZ trust than
capital gains free property?
You're either not listening or running away. Twatford was throwing poo,
Of course non-residents are buying houses!
And of course they are
using residents (either people or trusts) to register the ownership.
It is now absolutely clear that you do not understand the difference
between an investor and a registered owner.
The survey was about whether the registered owner is an NZ resident -
not about where the money came from or any other contractual
arrangements relating to what happens to the profits when the property
is sold. The government doubtless knew that they needed some survey
that shows them is as good a light as possible - its fooled you so I
suppose there are probably a good 10% of the population who are
ignorant enough not to look at the reality rather than the spin.
Desperate times call for desperate measures - "right", JohnO?
On Friday, 2 June 2017 08:34:27 UTC+12, george wrote:he can't even use his full allocation to reply to the budget:
On 6/1/2017 9:03 PM, JohnO wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.And whats more he deliberately can't understand that more money going
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
into a service means that there has been an increase in their funding.
On housing:
If it wasn't for people buying houses to rent those less fortunate or
less able to control their destinies would have nowhere to live.
And those terrible State houses where the less fortunate must dwell...
Terrible.
They're just as cold and damp as when they were built in the 30's and
50's and generations were born and bought up in those 'inadequate dwellings' >> Liebor must get sick of having to claim the current government is
spreading death and despondency at every turn yet it's the only tactic
they appear to have...
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
You know Labour are in the can when their leader is so out of his depth that
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/93159401/opposition-all-at-sea-after-joyces-nonelection-year-budget
Hopeless. Utterly out of his depth.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 02:03:50 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
His whole "chinky sound names" story was pure xenophobic, race baiting ignorance. Keith Ng showed it at the time.
Once again, the official numbers prove it:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11867735 >>
98% of houses sold to citizens or entities owned by citizens.
Twyford and his brainless little enablers should apologise and resign.
There is nothing surprising about this. Do you remember the story
about a resident student in Auckland who was living in an apartment in
one of the 20 or 30 properties he owned while attending a teriary institution? Why would you buy as a foreign resident when it is so
easy to set up a New Zealand trust to own the property - together with
New Zealand resident and tax-paying trustees!
Resident is a nicely flexible term - doubtless if a student does
decide to return back to a home coutry (or has to), there will be
someone else to take over "resident" ownership . . .
As I recall the single foreign owner with the largest amount of
property is Canadian, but certainly we have large ownership from
Australia, the UK, USA, and yes China.
Of course among the biggest corporate owners of property are of course
New Zealand companies that are owned by overseas companies - banks,
previous state owned entities . . .
The last 9 years have certainly seen far less of our land and property
owned by New Zealanders.
Still its good to know that Twyford is good enough that the Nats have
put out the message to attack him . . .
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 37:31:16 |
| Calls: | 2,117 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 11,149 |
| D/L today: |
315 files (11,412K bytes) |
| Messages: | 952,719 |