On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 07:59:42 UTC+12, george wrote:

Great idea. No-one goes there.
And its close enough for a P3 to spend a day looking for naughty folk.
And as for the line up of Maori leaders objecting the question arises. Weren't they paid enough first time round?
And no good making claims that their court case is on behalf of all
Maori because most wont see a cent.
We need conservation

But what about Maori traditional fishing around the Kermadecs?

<snigger!>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

Great idea. No-one goes there.
And its close enough for a P3 to spend a day looking for naughty folk.
And as for the line up of Maori leaders objecting the question arises.
Weren't they paid enough first time round?
And no good making claims that their court case is on behalf of all
Maori because most wont see a cent.
We need conservation

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

Great idea. No-one goes there.
And its close enough for a P3 to spend a day looking for naughty folk.
And as for the line up of Maori leaders objecting the question arises. >Weren't they paid enough first time round?
And no good making claims that their court case is on behalf of all
Maori because most wont see a cent.
We need conservation

The whole Maori claim looks like another "we want another bite of the
tax payer funding again"

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

On 4/12/2016 8:45 AM, Mutlley wrote:

george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

Great idea. No-one goes there.
And its close enough for a P3 to spend a day looking for naughty folk.
And as for the line up of Maori leaders objecting the question arises.
Weren't they paid enough first time round?
And no good making claims that their court case is on behalf of all
Maori because most wont see a cent.
We need conservation

The whole Maori claim looks like another "we want another bite of the
tax payer funding again"

I wonder how Mr Solomon feels sitting at the same table as those
descended from them who invaded the Chathams murdering and enslaving the inhabitants in 1835 leaving Tame Horomona Rehe as the last full blood
Maoriori ?
And will the Maoriori get redress???

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)

"Mutlley" <mutley2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a63ogb9dfp49c8fhash5u5ocmba6aqeu26@4ax.com...

george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:

Great idea. No-one goes there.
And its close enough for a P3 to spend a day looking for naughty folk.
And as for the line up of Maori leaders objecting the question arises. >>Weren't they paid enough first time round?
And no good making claims that their court case is on behalf of all
Maori because most wont see a cent.
We need conservation

The whole Maori claim looks like another "we want another bite of the
tax payer funding again"

Especialy when every sanctuary has proved beneficial to fishing when it's finally in place. Remember the furor at the setting up of the Poor Knight sanctuary. End result was fishermen pushed for more because of the increase
of fish outside the sanctuary's borders.

Pooh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)