• QEMM (dupe)

    From alterego@21:2/116 to All on Sunday, April 12, 2020 10:19:43
    Re: QEMM
    By: Spectre to Vk3jed on Sat Mar 28 2020 05:28 pm

    Wow, some weird things going on:

    ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄúúúú
    ³ Subj: QEMM
    ³ To : Vk3jed
    ³ From: Spectre (21:3/101)
    ³ Date: Sat Mar 28 2020 05:28 pm UTC+11:00 (14.8 days ago) ÀÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄúúúúúú

    This is from Spectre a couple of weeks ago, but it appeared today:

    The path is:
    X-FTN-PATH 4/122 100 2/100

    Why did it originate from 4/122?
    ...deon


    ... I can't promise anything but I can promise 100%.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)
  • From Oli@21:3/102 to alterego on Sunday, April 12, 2020 08:49:18
    alterego wrote (2020-04-12):

    Re: QEMM
    By: Spectre to Vk3jed on Sat Mar 28 2020 05:28 pm

    Wow, some weird things going on:

    +------------------------····
    | Subj: QEMM
    | To : Vk3jed
    | From: Spectre (21:3/101)
    | Date: Sat Mar 28 2020 05:28 pm UTC+11:00 (14.8 days ago) +-----------------------------------------------······

    This is from Spectre a couple of weeks ago, but it appeared today:

    These were all messages without an MSGID, so my crashmail didn't catch them as dupes.

    The path is:
    X-FTN-PATH 4/122 100 2/100

    Why did it originate from 4/122?

    good question.

    ---
    * Origin: (21:3/102)
  • From poindexter FORTRAN@21:4/122 to alterego on Sunday, April 12, 2020 00:03:00
    alterego wrote to All <=-

    This is from Spectre a couple of weeks ago, but it appeared today:

    The path is:
    X-FTN-PATH 4/122 100 2/100

    That's weird - I'm 4/122, and I re-tossed some .bad files in my inbound this morning. Didn't think they'd make it out or make it past dupe checking.


    ... Faced with a choice, do both
    --- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org (21:4/122)
  • From alterego@21:2/116 to poindexter FORTRAN on Sunday, April 12, 2020 20:27:28
    Re: Re: QEMM (dupe)
    By: poindexter FORTRAN to alterego on Sun Apr 12 2020 12:03 am

    That's weird - I'm 4/122, and I re-tossed some .bad files in my inbound
    this morning. Didn't think they'd make it out or make it
    past dupe checking.

    Ahh, OK that explains it - good we know how it happened.

    You are right, they shouldnt have gone out - the SEEN-BY's should have been enough for it to not leave your system...
    ...deon


    ... One child is not enough, but two are far too many.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)